|
News : 11th NAWG Workshop 15th October 2009 (in conjunction with the ICEM ’09 conference Full details) What is a natural analogue? The generally accepted definition of the term 'natural analogue' (Côme &Chapman, 1986) is "...an occurrence of materials or processes which resemble those expected in a proposed geological waste repository." This has subsequently been refined by the addition; "The essence of a natural analogue is the aspect of testing of models - whether conceptual or mathematical - and not a particular attribute of the system itself." (McKinley, 1989) and by an IAEA review group which noted that; "Natural analogues are defined more by the methodology used to study and asses them than by any intrinsic physio-chemical properties they may possess." (IAEA, 1989). The progressive refinement of the definition reflects a maturation in the understanding and appreciation of natural analogues. In essence, natural analogue studies use information from the closest possible approximations, or direct analogies, of the long-term behaviour of materials and processes found in, or caused by, a repository to develop and test models appropriate to performance assessment work. More recently, data from natural analogues have been used to explain complex repository concepts to non-technical audiences (e.g. Miller et al., 2000). Advantages The advantage of natural analogues over short-term laboratory experiments is that they enable study of repository-like systems which have evolved over the geological time scales of relevance to a radioactive waste repository safety assessment (rather than the days to months usual in laboratory tests). The disadvantage is that the boundary conditions and source term are often unknown or poorly controlled. In the light of more open discussion of radwaste programmes with a wider range of stakeholders than before, natural analogues are being used as solid examples of the long-term behaviour of materials used to construct radwaste repositories (e.g. Stuckless, 2002). For example, well-preserved ancient rock paintings in caves clearly show that even very delicate materials can survive millennia underground. Formation
of NAWG - Natural Analogue Working Group
These themes have been addressed at 10 international workshops.
Advances made since the formation of NAWG
References: IAEA (1989) Natural analogues in performance assessments for the disposal of ardioactive wastes. IAEA Technical Report, 304, International Atomic Energy Agemcy, Vienna. Côme, B. & Chapman, N.A. (editors) (1986) Natural analogue working group; first meeting, Brussels, Novenber 1985. CEC Nuclear Science and Technology Report, EUR 10315, Commision of the European Communitoes, Luxembourg. McKinley, I.G. (1989) Applying natural analogues in predictive performance assessment. Unpublished Nagra Internal Report, Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland. W.M.Miller, W.R.Alexander, N.A.Chapman, I.G.McKinley, and J.A.T.Smellie (2000) Geological disposal of radioactive wastes and natural analogues. Waste management series, vol. 2, Pergamon, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. J.S.Stuckless (2002). Natural analogues – one way to help build public confidence in the predicted performance of a mined geological repository for nuclear waste. Waste Management ‘02 Conference, February 24-28, 2002, Tucson, USA (http://www.wmsym.org/abstracts/2002/Proceedings/37/70.pdf) |
|